Among budget sedans, the most popular in our country today are the creations of a popular South Korean manufacturer and an equally famous domestic brand. Both cars have many supporters and opponents. But what is actually better - Hyundai Solaris or Lada Vesta?
Lada Vesta 2020
The sedans are very similar in size and technical characteristics. They also have similar driving characteristics. The Russian car has a unique and memorable appearance, although the Korean is quite recognizable. If the first car is usually praised, the second one is often criticized and not recommended for purchase. But is AvtoVAZ’s creation so bad?
Comparison of technical characteristics
The cars have similar sizes and technical characteristics. Dimensions of Hyundai Solaris (length/width/height) are 4370/1700/1470 mm, and Lada Vesta – 4410/1764/1497 mm. Thus, the Russian is slightly longer, wider and taller than the Korean. True, this difference is almost invisible to the eye. But the same cannot be said about the ground clearance, since only a few millimeters can play a role here. For Solaris this figure is 160 mm, and for Vesta it is 178 mm. Therefore, the Lada is noticeably more passable than the Hyundai.
Both sedans have excellent technical equipment. Even in the most minimal configurations they have a sufficient number of systems responsible for comfort and safety. And the maximum versions amaze with their excellent equipment, which is in no way inferior to many more expensive cars. If initially many car owners were wary of the equipment of domestic cars, they have already managed to convince themselves of its sufficient reliability.
The salon means a lot, almost everything
The second important aspect when choosing a new car is always the interior. Visually, the interior of both cars is quite good and it is difficult to single out a clear leader. As for everyday use, the Solaris has already established itself as a car with a well-designed interior that provides a high level of comfort by segment standards. Only time will tell whether Vesta will be able to respond in kind or surpass its competitor, but for now we can make a few assumptions.
Firstly, larger dimensions should, in fact, provide more free space. Secondly, Vesta has a 65 mm longer wheelbase, which also contributes to increased interior space. Tests of pre-production samples have shown that a passenger with a height of 2 meters can comfortably fit in the front row, but those in the back are no longer so comfortable and even with a height of 1.8 meters they have to touch the ceiling. They promise to fix this problem in the production version, but it is not yet known for sure whether they will fix it or not. As a result, so far the Solaris interior looks preferable, but this is purely due to the presence of a good reputation, which Vesta simply does not yet have.
Engines and transmission
Solaris offers customers only two types of gasoline engines with the following indicators:
- volume 1.4 liters and power 100 hp;
- volume 1.6 liters with a power of 123 horsepower.
Vesta has a slightly larger selection of power units. This:
- 1.6 liters of volume with a power of 106 “horses”;
- 1.6 l and power 113 hp;
- volume 1.8 horsepower with a power of 122 “mares”.
In addition, the Russian sedan has a Sport version, equipped with a 1.8-liter engine with a power of 145 hp. Therefore, the domestic car not only offers a larger selection of power units, but is also noticeably more powerful and resourceful than the Korean. At the same time, both cars have good acceleration and excellent fuel economy.
By the way, Vesta also has a gas fuel version, which, however, has not become widespread among Russian motorists.
Sedans can be bought with both manual transmission and automatic transmission, which has recently been installed on the Lada. If the Korean has this unit reliable and tested, then how it will behave with the Russian is still unknown. Vesta can also be purchased with a robot, the quality of which many car owners have complained about. The manufacturer assures that today all the shortcomings of this unit have been eliminated, but despite this, some drivers still experience this problem. In addition, they claim that the Lada Vesta with a robotic transmission accelerates poorly and is not very fast. Solaris drives quite confidently with an automatic transmission.
Cars are produced exclusively with front-wheel drive.
The Lada Vesta car is the first model of the Russian manufacturer...
...which turned out to be so successful that it poses serious competition to inexpensive foreign brands. Buyers are actively comparing AvtoVAZ's new product with popular Korean cars, and in many respects Lada is not inferior and even superior to foreign competitors. Today we will try to compare the Lada Vesta with the Hyundai Solaris model, which is widespread on Russian roads, and find out what the advantages and disadvantages of each of these models are.
Ride quality, maneuverability and handling
Sedans are distinguished by excellent handling and good driving performance for their class. They have a perfectly tuned and fairly reliable suspension, the parts of which are quite affordable. You feel confident in these cars in any weather and on any road. This is due not only to the suspension settings, but also to the precise operation of the electronic assistants.
If you compare the Hyundai Solaris or Lada Vesta, you can understand that the sedan of the Russian brand will be more passable. It has higher ground clearance compared to its rival, so minor off-roading is easy for it. Some owners call the cross-country ability of this car impressive for its class. Therefore, this car can be used for trips to the country or nature. But driving on a bad road in a Korean car is somewhat dangerous. The bumpers can be damaged, since the ground clearance is too low for such experiments.
Both cars are great for both city and country trips. True, in an urban environment, due to its considerable dimensions, some difficulties may arise with parking in limited spaces. But, thanks to excellent visibility and a rear view camera or parking sensors, this problem can be partially solved. On the track, the cars have excellent acceleration and good speed data. But the Hyundai Solaris with the lowest-power engine will experience some difficulties during acceleration and difficult overtaking. The same can be said about Lada Vesta with automatic or robotic transmission. And the same car in the “Sport” version shows a truly sporty character. It accelerates beautifully and can easily compete with higher class cars. By the way, some car owners claim that the regular Vesta shows real miracles on the highway and is superior in speed to its Korean counterpart.
In what configurations are they present on the market?
The price of Lada Vesta is slightly lower than that of its competitor. You can buy a Russian new product at a price of 515 thousand rubles, and in order to buy an excellent Solaris, which is a real bestseller, you need to have about 550,000 rubles in your pocket. Buyers will have to pay significantly extra to have a “robot.” By choosing Lada Vesta or Hyundai Solaris, the owner will not be disappointed if he is planning to buy a car for traveling around the city and on the highway. The warranty for a foreign car is five years, for Vesta – three years.
The basic equipment of a Russian car is somewhat more varied, which makes its purchase more tempting. However, while the Hyundai Solaris has a more powerful engine and a six-speed automatic transmission, it is the most popular class B product. Reviews in 2017 increasingly equate these two models, as the Lada Vesta is progressing very quickly in trim levels (coupe, station wagon).
Comparison of configurations and prices
Hyundai Solaris offers fans of the brand an excellent choice of six trim levels: Comfort, Active, Active Plus, Elegance, Super Series and Super Series II. They differ in the type of gearbox and power of the power unit, as well as the number of useful options. In addition, the manufacturer offers customers packages of additional options that are not very expensive, but allow you to slightly improve the vehicle. True, even without them the car has everything it needs. Today, the cost of a Hyundai in its most minimal configuration is just under 600,000 rubles. True, for that kind of money there won’t be many useful functions at all.
Vesta is available in four main trim levels: Standart, Comfort, Classic and Luxe. In addition, there is a “charged version” of the car called Sport. The cheapest sedan will cost buyers approximately 510,000 rubles. But its useful technical equipment will be minimal. In addition, the Russian brand offers consumers additional options. Such packages provide high-quality multimedia performance and provide motorists with some other useful and modern options. Such equipment is inexpensive.
Conclusion
If you don’t pay attention to the cost of cars and compare similar configurations, then you have to admit that the Hyundai Solaris looks more dynamic and attractive than its competitor. There is no noise, the car looks more powerful, there are more pleasant little things in the cabin, etc.
But, as soon as it comes to practicality, driving comfort and cross-country ability, then the Russian car becomes the undoubted leader. It is more adaptable to bad roads and is pleasant to sit and drive inside. The suspension is more comfortable, there is more space in the cabin, and passengers have much more space.
You can also read on this topic:
The new Gazelle car will replace the old one
Two in one - cross-country ability and speed - new Subaru
The Czechs are working hard on the compact crossover Skoda Fabia
Mitsubishi L200 2015 - a highly anticipated pickup truck
The Japanese announced the appearance of a seven-seat modification of the new generation Honda CR-V
Share on social networks
Dmitry Seregin August 3, 2017
Published in: Korean cars, Russian cars
Tags: Hyundai, AVTOVAZ, In Russia, Korean cars, Korean foreign cars, Our cars, new products, New, Russian cars, sedans
Maintenance costs
Both sedans are relatively inexpensive to maintain. But maintaining a domestic car will cost its owner a little less, according to the cost of spare parts and work in the technical centers of the official dealer. Both cars are quite reliable, and repairing them, if necessary, is usually not very difficult or expensive. But even here Vesta wins a little over Solaris.
Solaris configurations and prices
| # | Equipment | Model years | Cost, rub. | Drive unit | Transmission | Engine, cc. cm | Acceleration from 0 to 100, s | Max. speed, km/h | Power, max., hp (kW) at rpm | Fuel consumption in the combined cycle, l/100 km |
| 1 | 1.4 MT Active Plus | 2018 — | 845 000 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1368 | 12.2 | 185 | 100 (74) / 6000 | 5,7 |
| 2 | 1.4 MT Comfort | 2018 — | 880 000 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1368 | 12.2 | 185 | 100 (74) / 6000 | 5,7 |
| 3 | 1.4MT Active | 2017 — | 766 000 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1368 | 12.2 | 185 | 100 (74) / 6000 | 5,7 |
| 4 | 1.4 MT Active Plus | 2017 — 2018 | 739 900 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1368 | 12.2 | 185 | 100 (74) / 6000 | 5,7 |
| 5 | 1.4 MT Comfort | 2017 — 2018 | 779 900 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1368 | 12.2 | 185 | 100 (74) / 6000 | 5,7 |
| 6 | 1.4 AT Active Plus | 2018 — | 885 000 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1368 | 12.9 | 183 | 100 (74) / 6000 | 6,4 |
| 7 | 1.4 AT Comfort | 2018 — | 920 000 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1368 | 12.9 | 183 | 100 (74) / 6000 | 6,4 |
| 8 | 1.4 AT Active Plus | 2017 — 2018 | 779 900 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1368 | 12.9 | 183 | 100 (74) / 6000 | 6,4 |
| 9 | 1.4 AT Comfort | 2017 — 2018 | 819 900 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1368 | 12.9 | 183 | 100 (74) / 6000 | 6,4 |
| 10 | 1.6 MT Super Series II + 5″ Audio | December 2021 - 2020 | 867 000 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1591 | 10.3 | 193 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,0 |
| 11 | 1.6 MT Super Series II + 7″ Display Audio | December 2021 - 2020 | 869 000 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1591 | 10.3 | 193 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,0 |
| 12 | 1.6MT Super Series | 2019 — 2020 | 885 000 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1591 | 10.3 | 193 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,0 |
| 13 | 1.6 MT Super Series + Winter Package | 2019 — 2020 | 939 000 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1591 | 10.3 | 193 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,0 |
| 14 | 1.6MT Active Plus | 2018 — | 870 000 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1591 | 10.3 | 193 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,0 |
| 15 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2018 — | 905 000 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1591 | 10.3 | 193 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,0 |
| 16 | 1.6MT Elegance | 2017 — | 997 000 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1591 | 10.3 | 193 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,0 |
| 17 | 1.6MT Active Plus | 2017 — 2018 | 764 900 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1591 | 10.3 | 193 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,0 |
| 18 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2017 — 2018 | 804 900 | Front | Manual transmission 6 | 1591 | 10.3 | 193 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,0 |
| 19 | 1.6 AT Super Series II + 5″ Audio | December 2021 - 2020 | 907 000 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1591 | 11.2 | 192 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,6 |
| 20 | 1.6 AT Super Series II + 7″ Display Audio | December 2021 - 2020 | 909 000 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1591 | 11.2 | 192 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,6 |
| 21 | 1.6 AT Super Series | 2019 — 2020 | 925 000 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1591 | 11.2 | 192 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,6 |
| 22 | 1.6 AT Super Series + Winter Package | 2019 — 2020 | 979 000 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1591 | 11.2 | 192 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,6 |
| 23 | 1.6 AT Active Plus | 2018 — | 910 000 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1591 | 11.2 | 192 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,6 |
| 24 | 1.6 AT Comfort | 2018 — | 945 000 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1591 | 11.2 | 192 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,6 |
| 25 | 1.6 AT Elegance | 2017 — | 1 037 000 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1591 | 11.2 | 192 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,6 |
| 26 | 1.6 AT Active Plus | 2017 — 2018 | 804 900 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1591 | 11.2 | 192 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,6 |
| 27 | 1.6 AT Comfort | 2017 — 2018 | 844 900 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1591 | 11.2 | 192 | 123 (90) / 6300 | 6,6 |
Lada Vesta configurations and prices
| # | Equipment | Model years | Cost, rub. | Drive unit | Transmission | Engine, cc. cm | Acceleration from 0 to 100, s | Max. speed, km/h | Power, max., hp (kW) at rpm | Fuel consumption in the combined cycle, l/100 km |
| 1 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2020 — | 721 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 2 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2020 — | 765 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 3 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 757 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 4 | 1.6MT Classic | November 2021 — | 653 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 5 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start package | November 2021 — | 690 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 6 | 1.6MT Exclusive | November 2021 — | 878 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 7 | 1.6MT Luxe | November 2021 — | 783 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 8 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | November 2021 — | 824 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 9 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Prestige package | November 2021 — | 846 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 10 | 1.6MT Comfort | November 2021 - 2020 | 697 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 11 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Image package | November 2021 - 2020 | 720 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 12 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Multimedia package | November 2021 - 2020 | 728 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 13 | 1.6MT Standard | 2019 - November 2019 | 606 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 14 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Prestige package | 2018 - November 2019 | 807 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 15 | 1.6MT Classic | 2018 - November 2019 | 609 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 16 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start package | 2018 - November 2019 | 651 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 17 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2018 - November 2019 | 679 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 18 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Image package | 2018 - November 2019 | 702 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 19 | 1.6MT Luxe | 2018 - November 2019 | 700 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 20 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Image package | 2016 - December 2017 | 645 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 21 | 1.6MT Luxe | 2016 - December 2017 | 685 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 22 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 728 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 23 | 1.6 MT Luxe Yubileynaya | 2016 — 2017 | 735 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 24 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 707 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 25 | 1.6MT Classic | 2016 - December 2017 | 569 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 26 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start package | 2016 - December 2017 | 594 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 27 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start 6FD package | 2015 - December 2015 | 544 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 28 | 1.6 MT Classic 000 | 2015 - December 2015 | 514 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 29 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Lime Multimedia X4P package | 2015 — 2016 | 652 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 30 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Lime X00 package | 2015 — 2016 | 628 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 31 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Optima package | 2015 — 2016 | 599 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 32 | 1.6MT Luxe | 2015 — 2016 | 623 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 33 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2015 — 2016 | 647 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 34 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2015 - December 2017 | 622 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 35 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Image package | 2018 — 2018 | 685 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 36 | 1.6 AMT Luxe | 2018 - November 2018 | 735 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 37 | 1.6 AMT Classic + Start package | 2018 - November 2019 | 676 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 38 | 1.6 AMT Comfort | 2018 - November 2019 | 704 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 39 | 1.6 AMT Luxe | 2016 - December 2017 | 710 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 40 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 795 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 41 | 1.6 AMT Luxe Yubileynaya | 2016 — 2017 | 760 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 42 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 732 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 43 | 1.6 AMT Classic + Start package | 2016 - December 2017 | 619 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 44 | 1.6 AMT Classic 000 | 2015 - December 2015 | 569 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 45 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + XV Line package | 2015 - December 2015 | 663 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 46 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + Lime Multimedia package X4P | 2015 — 2016 | 677 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 47 | 1.6 AMT Luxe Lime X00 | 2015 — 2016 | 653 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 48 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Optima package | 2015 — 2016 | 624 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 49 | 1.6 AMT Luxe | 2015 — 2016 | 648 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 50 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2015 — 2016 | 672 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 51 | 1.6 AMT Comfort | 2015 - December 2017 | 647 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 52 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Image package | 2015 - December 2017 | 670 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 53 | 1.6 CNG MT Comfort | 2020 — | 891 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
| 54 | 1.6 CNG MT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 927 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
| 55 | 1.6 CNG MT Classic + Start package | 2017 — | 860 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 7,5 |
| 56 | 1.6 CNG MT Luxe | 2017 — | 953 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
| 57 | 1.6 CNG MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2017 — | 994 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
| 58 | 1.6 CNG MT Comfort | 2017 — 2020 | 879 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
| 59 | 1.6 CVT Comfort | 2020 — | 816 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
| 60 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2020 — | 860 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
| 61 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 852 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
| 62 | 1.6 CVT Classic + Start Plus package | November 2021 — | 785 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 63 | 1.6 CVT Exclusive | November 2021 — | 973 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 64 | 1.6 CVT Luxe | November 2021 — | 878 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 65 | 1.6 CVT Luxe + Multimedia package | November 2021 — | 919 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 66 | 1.6 CVT Luxe + Prestige package | November 2021 — | 941 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 67 | 1.6 CVT Comfort | November 2021 - 2020 | 782 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
| 68 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Image package | November 2021 - 2020 | 805 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 69 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Multimedia package | November 2021 – December 2020 | 813 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 70 | 1.8MT Comfort | 2020 — | 756 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 71 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 792 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 72 | 1.8MT Exclusive | November 2021 — | 913 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 73 | 1.8MT Luxe | November 2021 — | 818 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 74 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | November 2021 — | 859 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 75 | 1.8MT Comfort | November 2021 - 2020 | 732 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 76 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Image package | November 2021 - 2020 | 755 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 77 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Prestige package | November 2021 - 2020 | 872 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 78 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Prestige package | 2018 - November 2019 | 843 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 79 | 1.8MT Comfort | 2018 - November 2019 | 714 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 80 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Image package | 2018 - November 2019 | 737 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 81 | 1.8MT Exclusive | 2018 - November 2019 | 799 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 82 | 1.8MT Luxe | 2018 - November 2019 | 735 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 83 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2018 - November 2019 | 763 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 84 | 1.8MT Comfort | October 2021 – December 2017 | 657 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 85 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Image package | October 2021 – December 2017 | 680 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 86 | 1.8MT Luxe | October 2021 – December 2017 | 720 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 87 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | October 2021 – December 2017 | 748 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 88 | 1.8MT Exclusive | 2017 - December 2017 | 799 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 89 | 1.8 AMT Luxe + Prestige package | 2018 - November 2019 | 848 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 90 | 1.8 AMT Comfort | 2018 - November 2018 | 707 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 91 | 1.8 AMT Comfort + Image package | 2018 - November 2019 | 762 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 92 | 1.8 AMT Exclusive | 2018 - November 2019 | 881 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 93 | 1.8 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2018 - November 2019 | 830 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 94 | 1.8 AMT Exclusive | 2017 - December 2017 | 824 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 95 | 1.8 AMT Comfort | October 2021 – December 2017 | 682 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 96 | 1.8 AMT Comfort + Image package | October 2021 – December 2017 | 705 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 97 | 1.8 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | October 2021 – December 2017 | 773 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
* — information on prices is for reference only. Check with your local dealer for exact pricing.
Model options
Hyundai Solaris is presented on the market in three trim levels: Active Plus, Comfort. The price difference depends on the configuration. In the comfort version you can see leather steering wheel upholstery, fabric door trim, a “supervision” instrument panel, electrically heated mirrors, “Bluetooth” for connecting a mobile phone to the audio system, “hands free” speakerphone and many other pleasant options.
You will have to work hard when choosing equipment for the Togliatti flagship, because there are many configurations of the Lada: Classic, Classic Start, Comfort, Comfort Image, Comfort Multimedia, Luxe, Luxe Multimedia, Exclusive. In the exclusive version you can see such options as leather steering wheel, pedal covers, sockets for rear passengers, electric power steering, 3-level heated front seats, heated rear seats, rain and light sensors, climate control, etc.
Appearance, dimensions
Sedans are approximately the same size. But the Russian car is slightly larger than its rival, which is almost invisible to the eye. The domestic car has a unique and inimitable appearance. But the Korean design is also quite recognizable, although it lacks such characteristic and unusual features.
Hyundai Solaris looks quite stylish and in the spirit of current automotive trends. After the next update, his appearance changed somewhat, becoming more interesting and individualized. At the front, the car is distinguished by a rather large radiator grille with small stripes, as well as chrome trim. The headlights are quite narrow, with an original elongated shape. In optics, depending on the configuration, it is possible to use LED elements. Lada Vesta has a truly unique appearance, which cannot be seen in any other car, not counting other new Lada models. At the front, the unusual X-style is expressed in chrome inserts on the front bumper. The sedan's radiator grille consists of fairly large stripes and is of considerable size. The headlights are medium in size and their shape is a bit unusual.
From the side, Solaris appears streamlined and embossed, due to small stampings on the body. Vesta attracts attention with its original X-shaped stampings on the wings and doors. Both cars can be equipped with both stamped and cast wheels of 15 or 16 radius. Alloy branded wheels have a recognizable design, characteristic of a particular brand.
At the rear, the Korean sedan attracts attention with an LED strip on the trunk, connecting the rear lights. The latter have a somewhat elongated shape. The Lada's taillights are also unusual in shape, but they seem larger than those of the opponent. On the trunk of the car there are large chrome letters with the brand name.
By the way, unlike its rival, Lada offers motorists not only sedan cars, but also station wagons. There are sedans and off-road station wagons. These cars differ from the main sedan only in increased ground clearance and some other parameters.
Appearance
It’s impossible to pick a winner – both models are good in their own way. Hyundai, made in its signature “flowing lines” style, and even undergone restyling, making it noticeably fresher, is undeniably beautiful and harmonious. An inclined profile, a radiator grille with a pair of chrome strips, and a stylish rear end are more than enough for the average buyer.
Externally, Solaris and Vesta look equally good - a fighting draw!
But the Russian model is not inferior to its rival. A powerful chop-shaped front end, X-shaped stampings on the sidewalls, which now represent the brand, a high rear – all this has already become synonymous with Lada. And large chrome letters on the trunk lid emphasize the advantages of the model and the seriousness of AvtoVAZ’s intentions.
Therefore, regarding the exterior, the choice will depend on the emotions and preferences of the individual buyer.
Salon and trunk
Both cars have a fairly spacious interior. Some find the Solaris to be a bit roomier in the back than its domestic rival. But, if this is so, then the differences are minimal. The interior trim of the sedans uses plastic, fabric and leather. All materials are of pretty good quality.
The dashboard of both Lada and Hyundai is distinguished by its impressive size and modern design. In the middle, a multimedia system with a large touch screen and quite good functionality catches your eye. In both cases, such a device is available only in maximum configurations. Cheap versions are equipped only with conventional radios. The sound of multimedia is quite acceptable, but for music lovers this may not be enough. The same can be said about the quality of sound insulation. But there is an opinion that West’s is a little better. Under the multimedia device in both cases there are buttons for controlling many vehicle functions. Their location is convenient for the driver. In some trim levels, both the Russian and the Korean can be equipped with a multifunction steering wheel. The steering wheel is medium in size, responsive and pleasant to the touch.
The chairs in both cases are quite comfortable. They can be covered with either fabric or leather, mostly in dark shades, depending on the version and the buyer’s choice. The seats have several settings, but the Lada has several more such functions. In addition, the seats of the domestic sedan support your back better.
The trunk volume of Vesta and Solaris is 480 liters. This is quite enough even for transporting fairly large loads. In addition, it is possible to fold the rear seat to increase space in the luggage compartment.
Car suspension comparison
The engineers of both companies did a very good job in this matter. The suspension in both cars is very good, reliable and stable. On average roads, the Lada Vesta is more stable and comfortable. Hyundai Solaris sometimes sways easily, but sometimes it is simply unnoticeable.
The Korean car has a new suspension. In the new model range, the company's engineers decided to eliminate some problems with the suspension and unified it with the Elantra. The rework was not in vain. The car has truly become stable and comfortable.
Lada Vesta is more intuitive and pleasant to drive. Solaris lets you down on high-speed turns, the steering wheel seems “Soft” and sticky, while on the domestic Vesta the steering wheel holds tenaciously and reliably, fulfilling all the driver’s commands.
If we compare cars on dirt roads, then it is clear that the victory will be with the domestic car. Lada Vesta has much greater ground clearance and for it a dirt road is not such a difficult challenge. Solaris is certainly too low for our roads. Therefore, on a dirt road you need to drive quietly and carefully, while on Vesta you can drive without fear of potholes and obstacles in the form of soil and stones.
Experts say that the suspension of a Korean car is more comfortable, while a Russian car is quite lively and collected. In general, it will not be possible to identify a leader. Both brands have done a very good job on their suspensions and they have virtually no significant shortcomings.
Which is better to choose?
The choice of car is always made only by the buyer himself, based on his own wishes and capabilities. But in this case, the process can be especially difficult, since the machines are surprisingly similar to each other. And their prices are not much different.
Solaris is slightly inferior to Vesta in terms of the availability of some comfort and safety options. In addition, the sedan does not have such a recognizable and original design. But this is a popular Korean brand, which is valued for its proven price-quality ratio. Russian cars still continue to raise doubts about the quality among some motorists.
Both cars are perfect for both the city and long trips on the highway. They are characterized by low fuel consumption and excellent power characteristics for their level. But Lada also has an almost sports version, which is impressive with its performance. True, cars in more modest trim levels also accelerate quite well. But this does not apply at all to Vesta on a robot, which is suitable only for calm drivers.
Cars can appeal to car enthusiasts of all ages and both genders. And the cost of their maintenance will suit even people with a very modest budget, especially since the machines are very simple and unpretentious. Therefore, if you have some experience, you can do many jobs yourself.
The cars have sufficient trunk space and good cross-country ability. Therefore, they are often bought by those who go to the country or to nature. But in this case, it is better to give preference to Vesta, whose cross-country ability is slightly better than that of its opponent.
Due to the low cost of the cars themselves and their inexpensive maintenance, coupled with their reliability and simplicity, they are often purchased as a taxi or a company vehicle.
Interior
In general, both cars look similar from the inside and are decorated very well. At first glance, it’s hard to say which of them looks better, but reviews from motorists who managed to buy both models are generally inclined in favor of Solaris - the internal equipment of this model is more convenient, practical, all elements look reliably made. In addition, the model is time-tested.
But Vesta has a larger internal volume, which ultimately eliminates the difference in the quality of internal equipment.
Body, interior, electrical
Polo has been in production for almost 10 years, Vesta's lifespan is half that, so it is still difficult to fully judge age-related problems. Nevertheless, in terms of paintwork strength and body corrosion resistance, both cars are comparable, plus or minus. Frankly, they don’t rot, but on well-travelled cars you can already find local pockets of corrosion. However, this hardly applies to cars that are three or four years old - just before purchasing, you should check the body for the absence of such problems, and after purchasing, spare no time and money for a high-quality anticorrosive agent.
There are probably more “crickets” in the interior of a used Vesta than in a Polo, but this mostly applies to cars from the early batches, then the situation improved. Rubbing side windows are also the scourge of the first copies. In any case, nothing critical. Failures of functional equipment are possible, but early versions of Polo could not do without it. It depends on your luck: some owners drive without problems for years, while others encounter problems with the air conditioning (Polo) or multimedia system (Vesta). So we just check the equipment before purchasing.
In general, in terms of the durability of the body, the endurance of the interior, the reliability of functional equipment and electrics, there is plus or minus parity. Some problems were noted in both models, but neither Polo nor Vesta have any serious shortcomings in this regard. Of course, you should understand that we are talking about budget cars, where you have to turn a blind eye to easily scratched hard plastic or the same notorious “crickets” in the cabin. But if we take corrosion resistance, we cannot say that Vesta looks worse than Polo here, and Polo is inferior, for example, to much more expensive Volkswagen models.
